Pennywise and the Problem with (Some) Horror: When Tropes Attack LGBTQ+ Storytelling

Pennywise. The dancing clown. The embodiment of fear, lurking in the sewers of Derry, Maine. A terrifying figure for many. But, for some, the true horror of It: Chapter Two isn't the red balloons or the razor-sharp teeth. It's the way the film, and other horror movies like it, grapple – or, rather, fail to grapple – with LGBTQ+ representation.

Let's dive into why. The film adaptation of Stephen King's epic novel opened with a jarring and controversial scene: a brutal hate crime targeting a gay couple. This moment, many argue, sets a problematic tone. It's a grim introduction, a splash of gore that, ultimately, feels disconnected from the core narrative and, crucially, exploitative.

The Problem with Shock Value

The film's creators drew from real-life violence to create a terrifying moment. However, this act, without deeper exploration, comes across as purely sensational. Some critics argue that the use of this hate crime, so early on, feels like a cheap shot. It's a grab for immediate shock value rather than an attempt to explore the complexities of homophobia. The film focuses on the horror of the attack itself, using it to kickstart the terror. Then the focus is shifted away, with minimal mention or lingering effects. In the end, this decision takes away the chance for the audience to feel the true impact of the violence.

Why does this matter? Because horror, at its best, uses the monstrous to examine real-world fears. It allows us to confront the darkness that exists within ourselves and society. This can lead to understanding and empathy. But when real-life trauma is deployed as a simple jump scare, it risks becoming a shallow spectacle, devoid of the empathy needed to make a meaningful impact. The opening scene, lacking context and deeper exploration, felt like a moment of shock value, leaving viewers with a bad taste and a feeling of exploitation.

Richie Tozier: The Subtext That Became Text (and Maybe Missed the Point)

Beyond the opening scene, the character of Richie Tozier, played by Finn Wolfhard (as a child) and Bill Hader (as an adult), presents another layer of complexity. In the film, Richie's implied queerness is central. The books also give hints about a deeper relationship between Richie and Eddie, with implications about love and longing.

• The Subtext: Many readers saw Richie as closeted, with hidden feelings for Eddie Kaspbrak. This subtext, subtle in the book, was amplified in the miniseries.
• The Text: In Chapter Two, the film seems to address this subtext.
• The Execution: While potentially promising, the film's handling, without enough context, doesn't quite hit the mark. The revelation feels sudden and lacking in true emotional weight.

Richie's "reveal" is not bad on its own. The character's coming to terms with his true feelings could have been a powerful moment of self-discovery. But, again, the overall context and tone don't serve this sub-plot in the best way. This is particularly apparent given the early hate crime. The movie's handling of these sensitive topics can feel like a misstep.

Why Accurate Representation Matters

It is crucial for films to present accurate and in-depth LGBTQ+ portrayals. Here's why:

• Visibility: Seeing ourselves represented on screen affirms our existence and combats feelings of isolation.
• Empathy: Well-crafted stories can foster understanding and bridge divides between communities.
• Inspiration: Positive representation provides role models and encourages self-acceptance.
• Shifting the Narrative: When stories are told, LGBTQ+ characters become more than just stereotypes. They can take center stage and tell their own stories.

The problem isn't simply the presence of queer characters. It's the *way* they are portrayed. Are they fully realized human beings with complex emotions and motivations? Or are they reduced to stereotypes or plot devices?

Pennywise: A Symbol, Not a Savior

While Pennywise is just a form, a manifestation of fear, the entity that he embodies is not limited by gender. It's important to remember that the Clown is a symbol. He represents the dark things that humans hide. That fear can be internalized. That fear can be inflicted. And, in the film, Pennywise's monstrous acts could be a reflection of something else going on within our society.

The film, while not actively promoting hate, misses an opportunity to confront real-world issues with a nuanced perspective. That's where a deeper exploration of the clown and its impact on queer individuals would create a more compelling story. The characters are left to their own devices without proper closure.

Looking Ahead: How Horror Can Do Better

Horror can be a powerful vehicle for social commentary, but it must be handled with care. Here's what future filmmakers can learn:

• Avoid Exploitation: Don't use real-life trauma for cheap scares. Explore the *why* behind the horror.
• Nuance is Key: Develop complex characters and storylines that defy stereotypes.
• Empathy Matters: Put yourself in the shoes of the characters and ask, "What are they truly feeling?"
• Consult: Bring sensitivity readers or diversity experts into the process to ensure accuracy and respect.

The dance between horror and societal issues is not always easy, and the It films highlight that. But by being more thoughtful and intentional in their storytelling, filmmakers can craft truly terrifying and thought-provoking experiences that resonate with audiences on a deeper level.

In Conclusion

The challenge for horror films is not to shy away from difficult topics, but to handle them with grace, intelligence, and empathy. While It: Chapter Two has its moments of terror, it also demonstrates the pitfalls of exploiting real-world violence and the importance of nuanced LGBTQ+ representation. As audiences become more discerning, the demand for meaningful and authentic storytelling will only grow. Let's hope future horror films heed the call and strive for a more inclusive and impactful approach.